.: Register | Login Now :.
 
December Gaming?
Prince of Persia
Rise of the Argonauts
Destroy all Humans
 
 
 




Battlefield: Bad Company - Review

by Dakota Grabowski

Battlefield: Bad Company is ready to offer players more modern warfare for those who can’t get enough of it. The only problem with that is that Bad Company pales in comparison to Call of Duty 4, the best modern first-person shooter on the market. With that being said, let’s dive deeper into a few reasons why one may want to own a copy of Battlefield: Bad Company

Pitting players in within large scale battles online, Bad Company is by all means a decent game with a couple redeeming qualities. The first of which is the massive online battles that take place. Allowing up to 24 players to duke it out online, Bad Company’s online play is broken down into “attackers vs. defenders” gameplay. The defenders must defend their gold crates as the attackers continue on their position. If the attackers manage to capture the gold crates at the first position on the map, the defenders have to fall back to defend another set of gold crates. This continues until the attacking team captures all the crates or the defenders are able to hold them off within the time limit. The other victory condition is to have the other team run out of respawns.

Even with this entertaining multiplayer option, Bad Company only has eight maps to play on. There simply aren’t enough environments to play through to give players a reason to keep coming back. Bad Company needs more maps added to help diversify the online play whether they are free download content or not. When other games in the same genre offer somewhere in the mid-teens in terms of map count, it’s apparent that Bad Company is lacking with diversity online. Another missing element that needs to be included in every shooter nowadays is co-op. If there was a co-op mode added in, or any other type of multiplayer mode for that fact, Bad Company would retain a lot more replay value. Thankfully, with all this judgment on their multiplayer, at least the game runs smooth online.

The other redeeming quality of Bad Company has to be the new Frostbite Engine that permits destructible environments. Players can run over trees, shoot holes into buildings, and practically decimate anything that is set before them. While it does the change up the game visually, the online gameplay it’s not as enjoyable with the addition of destructible environments. When a multiplayer game starts off, many players will rush to a tank and start their barrage of attacks from across the map destroying every building they can so players who don’t like using vehicles are stuck out in the open without any form of defense. Not the most enjoyable aspect of a first-person shooter, especially since the tanks takes three rockets to blow up.


page 1 2 


 
 
Gameplay: 7.4 Graphics: 8.8
Sound: 8.5 Controls: 7.8
Replay: 7 Live Play: 7.6
 
 
General rating:
 
 
 
Member Comment
SirTophamHatt
2008-07-29 23:34:40

I rented this game and kept it about a week past when it was due back to the store. It was pretty fun but I disliked certain things about it. First of all, the fact that there's a certain gun that can only be unlocked by preordering the game is pretty lame if you didn't know anything about the game before it came out. Secondly, I had a major problem unlocking some other guns via some bs with my EA account not being able to link to the game correctly for about four or five days (not cool when you rented the game). They could have done without this and just made these guns regular unlockable weapons. There was absolutely no need to create these extra "Find All Five" hoops for players to jump through, especially when some of them didn't work without having to contact customer service (I wasn't the only one who had a problem with this judging from what I've seen on forums). Other than that, the vehicles were wicked fun, there was a lot of teamwork incentive in multiplayer, the graphics were good, the gameplay was good, the controls were fine, and some of the toys you can play with are just awesome. Nothing like being a sniper, whipping out a laser designator, and locking a cruise missile on an enemy vehicle. I didn't buy the game but I'd say it's definitely worth checking out the demo or renting it to see if buying it might be for you.
EndWar83
2008-07-29 14:28:51

I actually liked Bad Company a lot, thought the multiplayer was much better than the single-player but overall a decent experience in today's world of so-so video games....
Fatso
2008-07-29 09:52:11

I thought this game was fun. Yes there is a lack of maps and game modes but it still delivers a new experience that we have not had before; blow anything and everything up.
sickpup
2008-07-29 09:35:01

I played the demo and thought this game was absolutely terrible. From controls to mediocre graphics. The only game that I have played worse then this lately was Frontline Fuel of War. I would definately still play Battlefield 2 over this game.
Register now to post comments on Planet Xbox 360. Otherwise please login.
 
 
Related Games
2008-11-19 Left 4 Dead
Publisher: Electronic Arts 
Developer: Valve 
2008-11-01 Doom 4
Publisher: Activision 
Developer: id Software 
2008-11-01 Quantum of Solace
Publisher: Activision 
Developer: Treyarch 
2008-10-19 Far Cry 2
Publisher: Ubisoft Entertainment 
Developer: Ubisoft Entertainment 
2008-10-01 Project Origin
Publisher: Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment 
Developer: Monolith Productions 
Related Articles
2008-11-30 Left 4 Dead - Review
By: Chase Cook
2008-11-26 CoD: World At War LE Owners Getting Double XP Week
By: Eric Bush
2008-11-26 Call of Duty: World at War - Review
By: Jared Newman
2008-11-25 Bungie Renames Halo 3: Recon to Halo 3: ODST
By: Eric Bush
2008-11-25 Quantum of Solace - Review
By: Dakota Grabowski
 
Battlefield: Bad Company
Publisher
Electronic Arts 
Developer
Digital Illusions 
Game Genre
First Person Shoot... 
Release Date
2008-06-24 

Silver
 
total images available: 43
.: Home| Contact Us| Advertise with Us| Terms and Conditions| Privacy Policy :.